An argument in favor of paying college athletes

The purpose of this article is to provide the reader with a new perspective and some historical insight — all supported by the literature — regardless of their stance on this issue.

Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes

The damage is particularly acute for African-American student-athletes, who are graduating at significantly lower rates than African-American non-athletes. Ultimately, they have no real democratic recourse in an unjust system. Student athletes are also over-scheduled with study halls, practices, weight training sessions, film study, individual workouts, more practice, travel, and competition; all in an attempt to help athletes maintain focus on their sport.

An analysis of whether student-athletes should be paid. The business of sports. So, the equitable-application excuse for not paying athletes doesn't hold water; at the very least there's a level of hypocrisy here that ought to make the opponents of paying athletes uncomfortable.

The position here is that, like many organizations, the NCAA should not be dismissed or discredited on one issue due to the mishandling of others. Will each player receive the same amount. And so the pay-for-play discussion continues. NCAA as a Cartel. He points out that: Universities could also grant the athletes free academic classes until they earn a degree even after playing days are over.

However, considering the fact that certain college sports generate millions of dollars for college athletic programs, many people believe the athletes are being used. Therefore, I submit five proposals that could possibly be implemented: There Are Problems with Payment Despite the well-documented scandals and corruption in college athletics 30many would probably agree that paying athletes would exponentially increase the need for intense NCAA oversight — an enormous task by all accounts.

Hosick at the NCAA. I feel like a student athlete. First, we must agree that it is fair to compensate NCAA Division I football and basketball athletes beyond that of an athletic scholarship; then and only then may payout details be chronicled.

For instance, Robert Smith, former running back for Minnesota Vikings and pre-med student while at Ohio State, needed two afternoon labs in the same semester. Paying College Athletes Dear Mr. Education is Money Colleges and universities provide an invaluable and vital service to our communities: This prompted President Theodore Roosevelt to summon the presidents of Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, and threaten them with a ban unless the sport was modified.

What is the real purpose. The University Offers More Than an Education Concerts, lecture series by prominent people, on-stage productions, movies, intramural sports, fitness facilities, and a variety of clubs are all part of the typical university experience.

The athletes who receive full scholarships can get a free college degree that could be worth up to the same amount depending on the school you attend. They have female chaperones. A college degree is essential to get a good job which would result in a higher salary and possibly a better life.

Paying college athletes would greatly benefit both the athlete and the school. Opposing views of paying college athletes believe that the athletes are getting enough money from the scholarships. [ad_1] For quite some time now, there has been a big debate about whether or not college athletes should be paid.

Some people believe that a scholarship should be payment enough. After all, a scholarship can be easily worth $15, - $25, or more per year, plus a career after college that can be worth a million dollars over a lifetime.

I used to argue vehemently against paying college athletes. Tuition, room, board and books were compensation enough. And even if, increasingly, it wasn't enough and virtually every kid who. Why N.C.A.A. Athletes Shouldn’t Be Paid. and basketball—the argument in favor of paying players is so searingly obvious as to seem undeniable.

drive to pay college athletes is a grave. Even if this amount was a small amount like $1, PER YEAR, per player (which totals ($, per year for a college football team with players), paid every month during the school year, it would be a lot more fair to the student athletes and most colleges at the Division I level could certainly afford it.

Argument Essay #1 ; Argument Essay #2; Compare and Contrast ; Novel Essay Paying college athletes would decrease the illegal payments that athletes often receive to go to certain colleges, which often occur now.

the people that oppose this argument believe that colleges should not pay college athletes because they have the opportunity.

College Athletes Getting Paid? Here Are Some Pros And Cons An argument in favor of paying college athletes
Rated 3/5 based on 96 review
College athletes deserve to be paid